GRE issue essay

-
A nation should require all of its students to study same national curriculum until they enter college.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting the position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Individuals are identified based on their nationality. Learning the national culture and the curriculum for all the student is essential in my opinion. I think a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college because different curriculum for different students may not create a similar kind of knowledge in them.

Firstly, for example, a student learnt a different curriculum and another student learnt different curriculum, then during their college admission the college will find it difficult to make a different criterion for all the students. So, there must be a general criterion for selection of students which can be made possible only if the curriculum before college is same. Also, some of the subjects require national level exams to be taken and that is not possible to make different questions for all the students based on their curriculum in school.

Secondly, a student is free to choose their faculty in college, before college there is no fixed concentration of subjects so, making different curriculum is not that important. Before college all the students require a basic knowledge on what they would like to study in their future and that can be made possible by making a national curriculum for all the students. This also have advantages for the colleges to specify a specific criterion for selection of students making a question common for all the students for one specific concentration of subject and analyze the level of knowledge of students.

Last but not the least making a specific national curriculum will preserve the time of member of schools to prepare a separate curriculum for the students. This can also have disadvantages like not all the students will have interest on same subject and they may not compete with others on that subject and that can be difficult for some students to clear the exam but overlooking some of these disadvantages as everything has good as well as bad aspects making a national curriculum has more advantages and it must be implemented by the all the schools of the nation.

In conclusion, making a national curriculum and making all the students to study that is more advantageous and is required before college as before college there will not be any fixed subject concentration of students.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TOEFL INDEPENDENT WRITING

-
1.       Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?” A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of subject being taught” Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. A good teacher is that who have the skills to make the students understand the subject that he/she is teaching with all his/her knowledge rather than the one who have the most knowledge among others. I agree with the statement that a teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of subject being taught as a teacher must be able to make the students understand the topic that he/she is teaching. If a teacher has the maximum knowledge on his/her subject matter but they cannot make the students understand what they are teaching then there is no importance of that teacher. During my school, there was one biology teacher he had a lot of knowledge in his field but he never made everyone understand th
Read more

GRE ISSUE

-
Image
"MEN AND WOMEN, BECAUSE OF THEIR INHERENT PHYSICAL DIFFERENCES, ARE NOT EQUALLY SUITED FOR MANY TASKS" Men and women are born with their own uniqueness which can not imply that they are not equally suited for many tasks. I do not agree to the claim that men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. For example, men and women can work in same workplace and do all the tasks that a man can do with the same ease and efficiency. In any company all men and women are hired for the same tasks there is no specific designation of task based on their physical difference or based on their gender. Similarly, in any hospital the hospital will not create a vacancy for female doctor or male doctor they rather create vacancy for a doctor. Here they are equally suited for the job. We cannot claim that they are not equally suited for the task because no any task is created specifically for men or women. They are categorized bas
Read more

GRE ARGUMENT

-
“MANNED SPACE FLIGHT IS COSTLY AND DANGEROUS. MOREOVER, THE RECENT SUCCESS OF A SERIES OF UNMANNED SPACE PROBES AND SATELLITES HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT A GREAT DEAL OF USEFUL INFORMATION CAN BE GATHERED WITHOUT THE COSTS AND RISKS ASOCIATED WITH SENDING MEN AND WOMEN INTO SPACE. THEREFORE, WE SHOULD INVEST OUR RESOUCES IN UNMANNED SPACE FLIGHTS.” The argument is about investing resources in unmanned space flight instead of manned space flight because manned flight is costly and dangerous. This argument is not a good argument because the conclusion is not made based on the evidence. Firstly, the argument does not specify what kind of information is gathered by manned and unmanned space flights. Unmanned space flights may not provide the same kind of information that manned space flights. As man can look and analyze the things better, we cannot claim that manned flights will provide more useful information. Secondly, the argument shows no data of previous years information gather
Read more